| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Neutrality issue edit
A lot of the section for his run as Nassau County Executive reads as more of an official website rather than a Wikipedia article. I started balancing it out some, but I feel that it needs more. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 21:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Mgravagna (talk · contribs) is responsible for much of the most biased content here, and mentions being a "fan" of Blakeman on his talk page. He denies any direct connection, though. His edits in particular need scrubbing. Apocheir (talk) 22:09, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Everything looks to be in order. Everything they have edited is appropriately cited and sourced as per Wikipedia rules. Credible sources were used. Perhaps you are being biased, which is not what Wikipedia is supposed to be. It's supposed to state facts that happen cited by credible sources. Baseballfan98 (talk) 16:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The article has been balanced out to be more neutrally written now. I would be okay with the neutrality tag removed; however, I do not feel strongly enough about the improvements to remove it myself. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 17:47, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well, it's not about how you feel. The editors followed the rules and backed everything up with credible sources. If you are doing this out of pure bias then you are a hypocrite. Which it seems you are. Baseballfan98 (talk) 14:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Baseballfan98 You're the one with the very clear and obvious bias. You didn't even actually read my comment, or at the very least, you wildly misunderstood it because I actually said that the current version of the article actually seems balanced to me and that the neutrality tag can be removed. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 17:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)