Talk:Conservative Party of British Columbia

Note re WP:COI (conflict of interest guidelines) edit

To party members who may wish to edit the article: please see WP:COI regarding conflict-of-interest concerning members of organizations editing articles about those organizations. I'm not saying this has happened here; this is a general comment/warning being placed on all BC political party pages because of problems with certain party articles and related pages....Skookum1 01:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Bccp-logo.gif edit

 

Image:Bccp-logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on British Columbia Conservative Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Columbia Conservative Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on British Columbia Conservative Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:16, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

This article is confusingly written edit

Under the heading "Founding and early years", the first sentence is

The BC Conservatives, known colloquially as the Tories, were formed in 1900 when the Liberal-Conservative Party selected its first provincial leader, Charles Wilson.

There are three different party names mentioned ("BC Conservatives", "Tories", and "Liberal-Conservative Party"), but not the party name that is the title of this article ("Conservative Party of British Columbia"). This is totally unclear. The first 12 words of the sentence suggest that a party called "BC Conservatives" was formed in 1900, and at that time it was also called "the Tories". But then the sentence mentions the "Liberal-Conservative Party". Is it saying that this was a third name for the same party? Or is it saying that somehow the "BC Conservatives" were formed in 1900 to oppose the Liberal-Conservative Party's new leader? Mathew5000 (talk) 01:28, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Far Right" description in infobox and prose edit

Any statements referring to the post-2023 version of this party as far right have been reverted a few times now. I'm not saying that's the entire party but clearly it has a presence in the membership, candidates and board. Look at the definition of Far Right in use on Wikipedia: "Contemporary definitions now include neo-fascism, neo-Nazism, the Third Position, the alt-right, racial supremacism and other ideologies or organizations that feature aspects of authoritarian, ultra-nationalist, chauvinist, xenophobic, theocratic, racist, homophobic, transphobic, or reactionary views" This is not a Nazi party, but it contains elements on that list including affiliation with the alt-right and transphobia. Dan Carkner (talk) 21:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Do we have any sources that claim this for party position? I see why it was removed the current source does not say this. Give it a few days see if we get sources if not we can just remove it again. Moxy🍁 22:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
We have plenty of sources that actually state that the party is on the centre-right, right, and are targeted towards voters with those beliefs.
Here's the CBC[1] mentioning a "growing debate in B.C. over who stands for the right side on the political spectrum". Here's another CBC article which quotes a political science professor, Hamish Telford:
"If they don't gain more traction and become the dominant centre-right party or right party, they could end up just splitting the vote down the middle with B.C. United, handing an easy victory to the NDP," said Telford of the Conservatives.[2]
Another source:[3]
"As the federal Conservatives rise in popularity in the province, both Rustad and BC United leader Kevin Falcon are jockeying for right-of-centre support"
The definition of far-right on Wikipedia and your personal opinion of whether the party fits the criteria cannot justify an edit like this.
Deathying (talk) 00:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC) Deathying (talk) 00:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

References