Talk:Brian Haberstroh

Edited by the spammer?

I came across this article when I read this article, and noticed that the word "spam" wasn't mentioned in the lead section. I had a look at the edit history, and noticed several edits by 63.118.11.114 (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log). The editor seems to be a bit inexperienced (doing several edits rather than one, suggesting an infamiliarity with the preview button), the IP hasn't edited any other articles, and the edits are pro-Haberstroh. Any thoughts? Andjam 01:12, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Yes

whois indicates that IP address 63.118.11.114 is owned by Brian Haberstroh.

Living people article

Everything in the article should be supported by inline citations from a reliable source. Andjam 17:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

I agree, but that gets somewhat difficult when the article is blanked. Erik Warmelink 17:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

It's easy to cite everything if the article is blank! Ok, you can always look at the article history. Andjam 17:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

I prefer to find citations for a non-blanked page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ErikWarmelink (talk • contribs) 18:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC).

Could we move the page, so the name becomes, say, Atriks? Erik Warmelink 11:26, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

I was able to find accessible sources to support the core statements, Ars Technica was especially helpful. Trimmed down the text, eliminating some unsupported details. Looks better now. Since the topic of the article ran a succession of tech companies within a short span of time, it's probably better to leave the article under his name. Could not find any info on his current activities beyond his LinkedIn account (not a reliable source), I guess he's been staying out of trouble.Robincantin (talk) 13:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brian Haberstroh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051127195102/http://www.hardwaregeeks.com:80/comments.php?shownews=2738 to http://www.hardwaregeeks.com/comments.php?shownews=2738
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080505162640/http://www.wired.com:80/techbiz/media/news/2004/04/63146 to http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2004/04/63146

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 8 November 2016 (UTC)