Talk:Breakwater (structure)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 September 2020 and 15 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Biostudent2.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

WP:SHIPS assessment

I've assessed this article as Start class primarily because of the sourcing. Per WP:CITE, this article needs in-line citations. The prose itself generally reads well, although the lead should be expanded so that it can stand alone as a concise overview of the article (see WP:LEAD). Parsecboy (talk) 16:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

It isn't about ships at all, I replaced it with engineering. --Brad (talk) 22:35, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Difference

Can anybody explain the difference between a Sea wall and a breakwater? --Feministo (talk) 17:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Dear Feministo, Sea Wall is a type of breakwater, or an attached breakwater (to the beach) for precisely, to protect the shore line.

--TP Adiwijaya (talk)

The (physics) principles underlying the design a breakwater depends on the intent. If the concept is only to dissipate wave energy smaller boulders may suffice. However submerged objects are lighter and easier for the wave forces to dislodge. (One of the ironies of bouyancy is that gravity makes submerged objects lighter and "pushes" helium balloons upwards - lol?)

Often the preferred design appears to be a layer of large boulders on top which is(are) difficult for the waves to submerge?? REALLY ideal would be large long rectangular boulders placed vertically so that the base is well below the base soil and the top well above the waves - something like Egyptians or Romans would build with surplus slave labour - lol?

Pete318 (talk) 14:43, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Breakwater (structure). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.channelcoast.org/programme_design/defence_type/?link=breakwaters.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090319213037/http://www.xbloc.com/upload/downloads/Overview%20breakwater%20armour%20units.pdf to http://www.xbloc.com/upload/downloads/Overview%20breakwater%20armour%20units.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:20, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Wave attenuator

Dear All, I believe this section is disproportionnate compared to the sections on caisson- and rubble mound breakwaters. I would suggest to reduce it to a few lines, to mention a real case (if any?) and to add the more common wave absorbing caissons like Jarlan-type and more recent applications in Beirut (BCD) and Monaco (Anse du Portier). Please let me know. Artreve (talk) 19:11, 16 August 2018 (UTC) comment added by Artreve (talk • contribs) 17:46, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

@Artreve I understand the need to provide consistent depth between topics and I agree this paragraph goes into unusual depth. However, as a reader, I greatly enjoyed this paragraph and want to learn more.

To that end, I'd like to request that this information be kept -somewhere- on Wikipedia, wether it be in this article, as part of an article about wave absorbing infrastructure, or in it's own article.

I'd also ask that one (or more) links be added into this topic because it is very interesting from a scientific/engineering perspective but leads the reader away from Wikipedia to learn more. 115.70.21.239 (talk) 04:28, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Floating breakwaters

Ideas for a new arcticle ?
See : http://www.vliz.be/wiki/Floating_breakwaters (in Dutch)
--Lamiot (talk) 14:38, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Sediment Effects and Environmental Effects

I am planning on adding two short sub-sections (Sediment Effects and Environmental Effects) to the "Unintended consequences" sectionBiostudent2 (talk) 19:11, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Living Breakwaters Grant

Hello all,

Curious as to the relevance of the Living Breakwaters Grant section. It seems to be a far too specific example of the general concept of living breakwaters, and could benefit from substantial editing or removal. Aksarvis (talk) 15:30, 4 October 2023 (UTC)