Talk:Boston–Brookline annexation debate of 1873

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 69.202.207.228 in topic pov check added

pov check added edit

The following section shows why not having references and citations for claims leads to potential POV issues:

The reluctance to let go of the current system led to accusations by the annexationists that the upper class was coercing the working class Irishmen into siding with them, since the Irish immigrants relied on the ruling elite to supply them with jobs. The truth, however, is that it was in the Irishmen’s best interest to keep Brookline separated from Boston. If the status quo did not change, Brookline’s Irishmen would maintain their monopoly over all the manual labor done in the town. Thus, they benefited from the continual separation between the two communities.

that looks like a pov issue to me, especially with that phrase "the truth, however . . ."--Vidkun 19:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I would call this an essay before an article. 69.202.207.228 (talk) 02:09, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Brookline, MA Seal.jpg edit

The image Image:Brookline, MA Seal.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:49, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply