Talk:Bonk: The Curious Coupling of Science and Sex
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Irbisgreif in topic Untitled
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bonk: The Curious Coupling of Science and Sex article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Untitled
editThis page reads like an advert right now... I intend to bring it up for AfD if it remains an advertisement for long. I also have notability concerns. Irbisgreif (talk) 15:12, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that it's not a terribly well-written article, but I think you'll have an uphill battle with an AfD. This book has had lots and lots of publicity and reviews, and was a top 10 on the NY Times bestseller list. Joyous! | Talk 00:11, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- See, if that were in the article, my notability concerns would be assuaged. Irbisgreif (talk) 01:00, 6 August 2009 (UTC)