Talk:Boise National Forest

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Featured articleBoise National Forest is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 29, 2017.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 24, 2015Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 15, 2015Good article nomineeListed
May 6, 2016Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 30, 2015.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that mammals present in the Boise National Forest (pictured) include mule deer, elk, moose, black bear, pronghorn, mountain lion, coyote, bobcat, yellow-bellied marmot, beaver, and gray wolf?
Current status: Featured article

Length edit

This entry comprises about 240 words. The one on the Sawtooth National Forest is about 5,500 words. Strange. Sca (talk) 15:34, 3 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

See my comment about this at Talk:Sawtooth National Forest#Length. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 17:25, 3 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
This review is transcluded from Talk:Boise National Forest/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)Reply


Right, I willl take a look at this, make straightforward copyedits as I go (please revert if I accidentally change the meaning!) and jot questions below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

George Grimes and Moses Splawn... --> Needs a descriptor - i.e "Prospectors George Grimes and Moses Splawn...."
Most of Boise National Forest is underlain by the Idaho Batholith, and both include parts of the Boise, Salmon River, and West mountain ranges, with the forest reaching a maximum elevation of 9,730 feet (2,970 m) on Steel Mountain. - I can't figure out what the "both" refers to here. Could make first part of this sentence active.
Added "Prospectors"
Boise National Forest contains 75 percent of the known populations of Sacajawea's bitterroot. -I'd add "the endangered" to clarify why we are interested in this fact
Added that it is endemic, though not "endangered" on any U.S. federal or state lists.
European descendants - "descendants" ?? - sounds weird..."European settlers" or just "Europeans"..?
Changed to "European settlers"
After the 1860s Boise Basin gold rush ended, gold mining, along with tungsten, silver, and antimony mining, among other minerals, continued throughout the forest through the mid-twentieth century. - a triple category of things being mined makes the sentence a little cumbersome...
Changed to "After the 1860s Boise Basin gold rush ended, mining of tungsten, silver, antimony, and gold continued in the forest through the mid-twentieth century."
The first people entered Idaho near the end of the last ice age at the end of the Pleistocene - be nice not to use two "ends" in the one sentence
Changed to "The first people entered Idaho near the end of the last ice age in the late Pleistocene"
By 1951 when the last dredges shut down, at least 2.3 million ounces (65.2 million grams) of gold were produced from the Boise Basin area. - "had been produced"?
Changed. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 22:13, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'll read it again later today, and check against the previous FAC nom to give it as big a shove in that direction as possible. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Parts of the forest north of the South Fork Payette River and east of the North Fork Payette River are part of the Salmon River Mountains, which extend even further north and east outside the forest's boundaries. - there are two "parts" here, which would be good to reduce to one.
Removed the first.
The Danskin Mountains are a smaller northwest to southeast running range on the forest's southern border - I'd rewrite as "The Danskin Mountains are a smaller range on the forest's southern border that run northwest to southeast"
Changed.
.., which according to the Forest Service is considered to be land that is capable of supporting trees on at least 50 percent of its area - huh? Surely it means actual and not capable? What about a plot of land that is cleared forest?
Yes, this is correct. See page 11 here. It's odd, and I'll take recommendations for something better.Fredlyfish4 (talk)
..Lodgepole pine and quaking aspen may be found alongside Douglas fir in cooler areas.. - this is even cooler areas than the sentence before...?
Yes, I changed this to include moist and dry areas, although the wording doesn't seem right. Feel free to change.
yeah...maybe sticking in an "even" before cooler ...but that seems like overkill really, so nevermind.
Any notes on fishing and what species are caught most commonly?
I added a sentence about which fish are intentionally stocked for recreational fishing, but I don't have anything on which ones are caught often.
Any problems with any weedy plants in the forest?
I'll look into this and the fishing question.
Added a few sentences at the end of the flora section.
The warmest, driest forested areas occur at elevations from 3,000 feet (910 m) to 6,500 feet (2,000 m) and on south-facing slopes that are steep and dry. - do the areas need all of these prerequisites? In which case, the wording should be tightened to, "The warmest, driest forested areas occur on steep and dry south-facing slopes at elevations from 3,000 feet (910 m) to 6,500 feet (2,000 m)." or if not all needed, then reworded to include an "or" in it somewhere.
I think your version is best.Fredlyfish4 (talk) 02:26, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
To clarify, the warmest and driest areas are on south-facing slopes. The steepness often has an effect on moisture, so maybe the second dry isn't necessary. Plus steep shouldn't be necessary in an area that is largely mountainous. Maybe simplify to "The warmest, driest forest areas occur on south-facing slopes..." Fredlyfish4 (talk) 02:36, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Ok sounds good. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:00, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Made this change. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 23:54, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:   - ok, to me, I've been ok with the prose...but I am not exacting and can miss things...as we saw in the last FAC. So I am trying to go over it with a fine-tooth comb. Just about there with a couple of quibbles outstanding.
Manual of Style compliance:  

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:  
Citations to reliable sources, where required:  
No original research:  

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:  
Focused:  

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:  

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):  

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  

Overall:

Pass or Fail:   - see prose comment above. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC) passed - all good/nice work Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:39, 15 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kudos edit

 
Any word on what river this is? sca

Congrats on leading DYK today! Good article. Sca (talk) 15:09, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I tried to figure out what river it is, but didn't have any success. I contacted the forest about it but never got a response. Even this page on their website doesn't say. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 23:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 38 external links on Boise National Forest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boise National Forest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boise National Forest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:32, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply