Talk:Bobby Singer

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleBobby Singer has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 13, 2010Good article nomineeListed

Dezza91 10:57, 4 March 2007 (UTC) This needs to be edited. Badly.Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bobby Singer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Matthew R Dunn (talk) 12:44, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


At first glance, the article is in decent shape.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    In the plot section: "After John's death in the second-season premiere, Bobby allows the brothers to stay at his home to rest up and rebuild the recently-crippled Impala" Do you mean the car Chevrolet Impala? If so, then please link.
    I added a link to the main article's subsection on the Impala. Ωphois 15:59, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
    B. MoS compliance:  
    The lead section seems a little short; most of it is about the character, a little on how Jim Beaver was brought into the series. I'd prefer at least another sentence or so (or a second paragraph) detailing more from the development and reception sections (like the part where Beaver thought his character was originally one off, for example).
    In the "characterisation" section, the quote at the end of the first paragraph has no end speech mark (").
    I expanded the lead and fixed the quote. Ωphois 18:09, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Well done with the article so far, I certainly enjoyed reading it. There is just the odd point or two to deal with, and then I will pass this article. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 13:50, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
    Alrighty then, now that all concerns have been resolved, I will now pass this article. Good job! -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 19:31, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

'A certain website known for being snarky' edit

I don't have a dog in this particular fight being more a Beaver fan than a Supernatural one, but - assuming it's known - in the interests of completeness wouldn't it be correct to at least clarify what website is being referred to by the above remark in the 'reception' section. I assume it's TWOP from the description but, as a reader, have no way of knowing this. 94.193.220.27 (talk) 02:24, 30 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bobby Singer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:29, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bobby Singer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bobby Singer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:38, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply