Talk:Blue Lips

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Usernamekiran in topic Requested move 21 November 2017

Requested move 21 November 2017 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved per consensus.usernamekiran(talk) 05:28, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply



Blue LipsBlue Lips (Lady Wood Phase II) – Proper title according to Amazon, iTunes, Spotify, and Tidal. WikiRedactor (talk) 01:42, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose It is much more commonly simply referred to as "Blue Lips" in media reports and given that there doesn't need to be any clarification for ambiguity I see little reason to unnecessarily lengthen the title Guyb123321 (talk) 21:27, 22 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Support that is the correct name of the album. It is used on iTunes, Spotify, Amazon, Tidal etc. which should be a no-brainer that that's the official title of the album. Some press sites often shorten names of albums in reviews/articles just for simplicity. We should just move the article and change the first sentence to "Blue Lips (Lady Wood Phase II) (also referred to as Blue Lips)". AgWoolridge (talk) 07:50, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose The actual name of the album is only Blue Lips. The Lady Wood Phase II is used to identify that it's a sequel to Lady Wood. Music01 (talk) 11:59, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose The name of the album itself is Blue Lips. Plus, there's a lot of references that mention it just as that. cósmicotalk 11:12, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.