Talk:Black Hand (graffiti artist)

fails notability

per WP:ARTIST:

   Authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals:

   1. The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors.
   2. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique.
   3. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
   4. The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.

There are no peers who cite Black Hand as an influence or an important figure.

There are no known concepts, theories, or techniques (significant or not) created by Black Hand.

The artist has not created any new work since 2014. They are mentioned in a handful of Huffpo blog articles, not in any books, films or independent periodical articles.

The artist's work is not part of a monument. They have been featured in a single exhibition of unknown reputation. Their work is not known to be part of any galleries or museums.

This subject fails every tenet of relevant notability requirements and the article should be deleted. Denarivs (talk) 01:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)