Talk:Billboard 200
Latest comment: 4 months ago by 2603:8000:41F0:83D0:8DAC:4DC0:1146:7774 in topic Lady Gaga Consecutive #1 Debuts is Incorrect
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 4 October 2021. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Billboard 200 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 2 months ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Weeks
editDoes anyone have any data on the top albums that have spent the most total weeks on top 2/3/5/10/etc respectively, and if so can you make the list please?
Lady Gaga Consecutive #1 Debuts is Incorrect
editThe source states that “Chromatica” was Gaga’s 6th consecutive #1 but the chart still shows 5. Wait like a week to update though because it will soon be 7 :) 2603:8000:41F0:83D0:8DAC:4DC0:1146:7774 (talk) 05:56, 13 March 2025 (UTC)