Talk:Bibliography of fly fishing

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Table Cell Template For Individual Bibliographic Entries

edit

|- |colspan="2" |'''YEAR''' |- | {{cite book |last= |first= |authorlink= |coauthors= |title= |year= |publisher= |location= |isbn= }} |

--Mike Cline 10:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Self Imposed Guidelines For Bibliographic Entries

edit

In creating and compiling this annotated bibliography of fly fishing, I have attempted to always list the first edition of the work, especially from a date and publisher standpoint. Many of the works listed or to be listed will have multiple editions/printings available from different publishers and may appear in either hardbound, softbound or both. I do not intend to list reprints, limited or special editions if the original edtion is listed. Revised or updated editions will be listed. --Mike Cline 10:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

A additional guideline I imposed on myself is to list a title only once, even through it may fall equally in a number of the categories.--Mike Cline 19:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

NPOV

edit

"an argument that today seems", "readable but comprehensive", "excellent read", "probably the most", "beautiful compilation", "masterfully", "transcends the cavalier attitude", "very nicely written", "superbly told", &c. — according to whom? If these are merely your personal opinions Mike Cline, they don't belong in Wikipedia. If they aren't your opinions, then please tell readers whose opinions they are and attribute them properly. Uncle G (talk) 15:38, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

    • Uncle G, Indeed they are not my opinions but in most cases paraphrased from some form of notable review--either by other prominent Fly fishing authorities or as part of larger, academic and scholarly reviews of literature of the sport. Although it will take a bit of time, I will do my best to provide cites for all the annotations. Thanks for your advice.--Mike Cline (talk) 22:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

A proposal: "Matching the Hatch" by Schweibert should be added to the "clasics" list

edit

Absolutely a classic: the book's premise--that the life cycles of important food insects on the stream should guide the fisherman's choice of fly--is as fundamental to modern fly fishing as the casting stroke.

Schweibert Jr., Ernest G, Matching The Hatch, Macmillan 1955

Kaushal.dhruv (talk) 20:36, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Kaushal. Please add it. This article needs other contributors. I am surprised I haven't done it myself. However, per Uncle G's admonitions above, please cite sources for your annotations.--Mike Cline (talk) 21:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit

Per WP:MOS, this article should be titled "Annotated bibliography of fly fishing", with "Annotated Bibliography of Fly Fishing" redirecting to the lowercase title, rather than the other way around. --Lquilter (talk) 20:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • My apologies for making the cut/paste move. As you can tell I completely concur. Although I contribute regularly to WP, I must bone up on some of the more technical aspects of maintaining this thing to avoid this in the future.--Mike Cline (talk) 13:34, 31 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

A major reformatting and split made

edit

This single bibliography was getting a bit too large to manage and the table format was unwieldy for the large number of entries. Changes format to a more traditional bulleted list and split off two new Bibliographies: Bibliography of fly fishing (species related) and Bibliography of fly fishing (fly tying, stories, fiction) to create more managable lists.--Mike Cline (talk) 19:43, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bibliography of fly fishing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:28, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bibliography of fly fishing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply