Possible conflict of interest issues edit

Product descriptions that have crept in appear to have a promotional tone in places and have been inserted by the original author of the article (I toned down before passing this through Afc). Language needs toning down and some of the statements are of questionable value and sound like marketing speak. Two examples that look a bit suspect are: 'Dress Pant Sweatpants...complete with pockets, belt loops, and even a zippered fly. However, instead of being scratchy and uncomfortable, they're made with soft French-terry fabric' and ' "(Cordarounds are) more aerodynamic," according to Chris Lindland, "You can get somewhere three nanoseconds faster in our cords than the traditional kind."'. Would also suggest that there is now an overuse of bullet points. In general, this needs to be returned to a more neutral writing style. The company is notable, and definitely good at attracting column inches, but this does not mean its Wiki page should be allowed to become an advert. Libby norman (talk) 09:19, 22 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

I flagged this back in April (see above) would suggest that some polite messages need to be sent to the people trying to convert this into a great big advert. Libby norman (talk) 22:55, 6 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
I fixed this. Chisme (talk) 22:23, 7 September 2015 (UTC)Reply