Talk:Berg River Dam
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Berg River Dam article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Berg River Dam appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 December 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is written in South African English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
WP:SAFRICA assessment edit
Very nice article, assessed as B-Class (which is the highest I can give it on my own). I suggest doing some copy-editing on it, then maybe give the GA process a shot. Good luck! Ron2K (talk) 19:34, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for the suggestion and glad you liked the article and ranked it as B-class. Concerning your suggestion, my experience with the good article review process is mixed. In the case of Water supply and sanitation in the United States it was actually painful to deal with some of the comments, which were more annoying than constructive. If you want to initiate the GA process in an appropriate category, I would certainly take a look at the comments, but I cannot promise that I am willing to take up all comments. Again, thanks for your support and for your work as part of the Wikiproject South Africa.--Mschiffler (talk) 19:22, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Berg River Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604112445/http://www.info.gov.za/speeches/2003/03041609461001.htm to http://www.info.gov.za/speeches/2003/03041609461001.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090327102756/http://www.capetown.gov.za/en/Pages/CapeTownsWaterSupplyBoosted.aspx to http://www.capetown.gov.za/en/Pages/CapeTownsWaterSupplyBoosted.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)