Talk:Beardmore Crane
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 180.180.1.126 in topic This page should not be speedy deleted because...
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
This page should not be speedy deleted because... edit
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --RandomPerson137 (talk) 21:10, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- This is why Wikipedia has no new editors, because there is such a massive kudos in getting new articles CSDed. I have around 20,000 edits with another account (you can guess which one, I lost the password) and it is interesting to go back as a "noob." For the record, my objection is that there are articles about the other five giant cantilevers that were on the Clyde, and this was one of the focal points of a very significant shipyard. RandomPerson137 (talk) 21:10, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Notability is suggested by it being one of the first modern high capacity cranes in Britain? Theroadislong (talk) 21:36, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
This page should not be speedy deleted because... edit
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --180.180.1.126 (talk) 12:10, 11 June 2019 (UTC) Kib
This page should not be speedy deleted because... edit
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --180.180.1.126 (talk) 12:11, 11 June 2019 (UTC)