Talk:Baxstrom v. Herold

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 2601:500:8300:399:5923:AC28:C08E:D09B in topic Wildly incorrect holding

Wildly incorrect holding

edit

I don't have time at the present to update the accuracy of this article, but it is wildly inaccurate. This case has absolutely nothing to do with the Double Jeopardy Clause, but instead it has to do with the Equal Protection Clause under the Fourteenth Amendment (see the ref in the article itself). Marking it as disputed for assistance. 2601:500:8300:399:5923:AC28:C08E:D09B (talk) 01:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply