 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Page views for this article over the last 30 days | ||
|---|---|---|
Detailed traffic statistics |
 | It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Chile may be able to help! |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Tucapel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080526101641/http://www.artehistoria.jcyl.es:80/cronicas/contextos/11498.htm to http://www.artehistoria.jcyl.es/cronicas/contextos/11498.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080524112252/http://www.artehistoria.jcyl.es:80/cronicas/contextos/10875.htm to http://www.artehistoria.jcyl.es/cronicas/contextos/10875.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Battle of Tucapel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.artehistoria.jcyl.es/cronicas/contextos/11498.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.artehistoria.jcyl.es/cronicas/contextos/10875.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303195617/http://www.historia.uchile.cl/CDA/fh_complex/0%2C1393%2CSCID%3D10200%26ISID%3D404%26JNID%3D12%2C00.html to http://www.historia.uchile.cl/CDA/fh_complex/0%2C1393%2CSCID%3D10200%26ISID%3D404%26JNID%3D12%2C00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Bias
editThis article is written entirely from the a Spanish point of view. Spaniards are described as having “valor” and “bravery,” while Mapuches use “deception” and torture. The Spanish invaders are described as “conquerors” while Mapuches (referred to in article as “Indians”) are described as “rebels,” which implies that Spaniards were the governing force rather than invaders. Mapuche successes are attributed entirely to their copying of Spanish tactics. A variety of conflicting Spanish sources are used to imply that mapuches are “vengeful” torturers. No effort is made to use sources from a Mapuche perspective. 24.196.171.154 (talk) 00:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)