Talk:Battle of Tippermuir

Latest comment: 2 years ago by PatGallacher in topic And No Quarter

Archers edit

I have removed the references to archers. They are based on Wishart's use of the the term 'saggitarii', which, though it does strictly mean 'archers' would be more accurately translated as 'irregular' infantry. Had the Roayalist army really deployed archers it would be remarkable that no-one - apart from Wishart - took notice. I would be perfectly happy to see the term 'archers' restored if better evidence for their employment can be produced. (Dr.) Chris Brown. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.110.125 (talk) 11:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Archers and Horse edit

The archers also appear in a dispatch sent to Ormonde by an Irish officer of Colkitto's brigade ("the Lord Kilpunt commanding the bow-men" [1]), and in Gordon of Ruthven ("the Atholl and Banzenoch men had swordes, bowes, and fyreockes" [2]). The references are to the troops who were the left and right wings, respectively.

The comments on cavalry numbers in the current version of the article, however, seem to be based on a misunderstanding: in England, Montrose had command of a cavalry force including some "Northern Horse", (English royalist cavalry) lent by the Marquis of Newcastle; these troopers were left in England, and Montrose had no cavalry at all at Tippermuir (something agreed on by all the primary sources); after the battle, he made a rendezvous with a completely different force of "northern" horse (Scottish royalist cavalry), who provided a new cavalry contingent at the Battle of Aberdeen. AJN (talk) 00:10, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Tippermuir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:41, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

And No Quarter edit

This article (and the article on Walsh's book) are slightly ambiguous about the traditional story that the Covenanter slogan was "Jesus, and no quarter". Do we have clarification on this? PatGallacher (talk) 19:58, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply