Talk:Battle of Ferozeshah

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Figures of sikhs underestimated

the sikh forces numbered 40,000-60,000 and not 10,000 it was gough 5000 force which stopped 50,000 strong sikh force in the battle.Shail kalp (talk) 05:07, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Ferozeshahr

Many articles including this one of Khushwant Singh, refers this place as Ferozeshahr. Is this a spelling mistake? --Vssun (talk) 07:27, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Ferozeshah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161231180841/http://www.britishbattles.com/first-sikh-war/ferozeshah.htm to http://www.britishbattles.com/first-sikh-war/ferozeshah.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161231180841/http://www.britishbattles.com/first-sikh-war/ferozeshah.htm to http://www.britishbattles.com/first-sikh-war/ferozeshah.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC)