Talk:Barchester Pilgrimage

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 10 January 2016

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move per request. Mistaken title. Google Books search confirms.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:31, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Barsetshire Pilgrimage → Barchester Pilgrimage – Simple error in book title to be corrected. The book title is really Barchester Pilgrimage (check any online reference such as abebooks.com or worldcat.org), not Barsetshire Pilgrimage. The confusion is that Barchester refers to the town in which most action takes place, but Barsetshire refers to the larger county which includes the town. This article would be autolinked (if the title is corrected) from the article on the author Ronald Knox. 97.88.205.98 (talk) 20:45, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy Move: OP looks to be correct. ‑‑Yodin^T 23:15, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic