Talk:Bachelor of Civil Law

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

DPhil and DCL edit

After obtaining the BCL degree, it is possible (though rare) to proceed to the degree of Doctor of Civil Law (DCL) in recognition of published work or court judgments. It is also possible separately to carry out legal research work as part of the Doctor of Philosophy (DPhil) programme.

I shan't rewrite this (yet!) but I do think it is unclear.

Firstly, is it really necessary to have the BCL before taking the DCL? I have never heard that it is and I can't see any rationale for it. Indeed, I should be surprised if everyone who is a DCL was a BCL before that. I am prepared to be surprised though!

Sorry, I was too hasty. It is all explained here: http://www.ox.ac.uk/gazette/1997-8/weekly/190398/acts.htm#3Dec The BCL does appear to be a prerequisite for the DCL, but I think this is only a technicality. A suitably qualified candidate for the degree of DCL who does not already hold the degree of BCL is admitted to both degrees at the same time without having had to earn the BCL in the usual way.

Secondly, I think it is rather a mistake to mention the possibility of progression to the DCL before mentioning the possibility of going on to take a DPhil. As I am sure the person who wrote this meant to convey, the BCL may be used as a stage towards doing a DPhil, rather as an MA (in the non-Oxbridge/Dublin sense), MSt, MSc, MPhil, etc might be a stage towards a DPhil (or PhD). The DCL would possibly then be conferred after perhaps twenty or more years of scholarship.--217.134.108.63 08:18, 13 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Things may have changed a bit since my day, but back then there were two ways you could get a DCL. Firstly, if you were one of the great and the good, you got awarded one as an honorary degree (the same way other law faculties confer an LLD), and obviously there is no precondition (so far as I know, Nelson Mandela does not have a BCL). Secondly, if you did have a BCL, you could write a fairly manificent thesis at least 7 years after taking your BCL, you could apply for a DCL on that basis. I have never heard of anyone being awarded one via the second route, but I think it is on the University statute book. Apparently there is a similar quirk in Cambridge where you can upgrade your BA to a PhD (instead of an MA) if you submit a thesis of top calibre work, but no one in practice ever utilises it. Legis 15:06, 16 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Postscript. What was extremely common though (and probably still is), is 2 year BCL candidates, enrolling for the DPhil, and then just bulking up the BCL thesis and getting awarded a doctorate after only 1 year. I very much doubt that practice has been stamped out yet. Legis 15:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

B.C.L./D.C.L./D.Phil. Distinction edit

The B.C.L. is essentially a one-year, taught-course, fancier addition to a basic law degree with a mini-thesis which attracts common law graduates from around the world seeking some of the Oxford experience plus a little prestige for career advancement back home. Some Oxford and other English University law graduates also sign up for it for a similar enhancement of their first degree. But it is not a research degree and is just an Oxford name for what elsewhere is an LL.M.

The D.C.L. is essentially an honour bestowed mostly on Oxford scholars who have done well but lack a research doctorate. They are uniformly embarrassed if they are addressed as 'Dr. X' after gaining a D.C.L., since they realise it is more an honourary degree for work published outside a university academic programme or other achievements in their legal career than a genuinely academic doctorate.

The D.Phil. in law is a research doctorate earned just like a Ph.D. anywhere else, and it is recognised as such in the academic world. If you have struggled for the six years or so of research, meetings with your supervisor, submission of a dissertation, and an oral defence of it before examiners, then you are a genuine legal academic with a doctorate, in this case, in law -- otherwise not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.198.164.122 (talk) 04:17, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bachelor of Civil Law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:16, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply