Talk:B. M. Bower

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Shepherd660506 in topic External links modified

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on B. M. Bower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello creator of the B.M. Bower page. Thank your for your work on this important author. I have done a lot of research on Bower and there are few edits I would like to discuss with you. The page cites Elmer Kelton that Bower's sales dropped once it was widely known that she was a woman. According to my research, it was never widely known that she was a woman--her publishers kept it a secret throughout her career. It was somewhat more well known in California when she was living there, but in those days, as you know, the word didn't spread like it does now. So I'd like to qualify this claim in the article. Kelmer himself asserts this as hearsay ("it is said that...) To come clean, this would mean citing my own book, "Westerns, A Women's History" which includes a chapter on pseudonyms and women's westerns. I did a lot of research on primary sources that I think has a legitimate place in the Wikipedia article. Also, I'd like to add a section about her Nevada mining adventures. I am currently writing a biography of Bower, so right now my stuff on Bower in Nevada is original research, but when it gets published I think it would be okay to use my biography as a source in the Wiki?. I'm new to Wikipedia editing and still learning the protocols. In the meantime, I think a can manage a few lines referring to her mining activity citing sources that are already out there. Let me know what you think and we can talk further about these editsShepherd660506 (talk) 14:33, 30 May 2018 (UTC)shepherd660506Reply