|WikiProject Linguistics||(Rated Stub-class)|
There's no article for "autonym (word)" which is a synonym for "homologue". Can someone enter a request to have "autonym (word)" redirect to the "homologue (word)" page? I didn't see a link anywhere to have words redirected. Perhaps only admins can effect this change? Staplovich (talk) 17:54, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- There is actually no need for such an article, because there is no synonymy between "autonym" and "homologue"/"autological". The logical term "autonym" as an attribute to words or symbols (not to be confused with autonym vs. heteronym as a self-given name) was introduced to logic by Rudolf Carnap and refers to just any word not used for representing its common conceptual denotate, but adduced for representing itself, normally within a metalinguistic statement (e.g. "five is a numeral" vs. "five is a number"). By consequence, metalinguistic statements about autological words necessarily have to adduce them as autonyms ("short" is short), but the same is true for metalinguistic statements about heterological words, too ("banana" is/is not a banana). Carnap's term refers to a mode of performance, not to a conceptual self-inclusive relation between denotate and material sign. --188.8.131.52 (talk) 08:26, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Inclusion of OxymoronEdit
After seeing this passage marked dubious, and finding no support for it either, I'm storing it here until someone can show that there's any basis for it. Do restore it if we've wrongly judged! hgilbert (talk) 03:13, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- Interestingly, non-autological words are sometimes playfully modified such that the new word becomes autological. Examples of such modifications include informal words like "ridonkulous" (saying the word "ridiculous" in a ridiculous way) and "ignant" (saying the word "ignorant" in an ignorant way). Words such as these are termed "synthetic autological words".[dubious ]
"Saxon" is not SaxonEdit
The point seems to be adequately made by saying that "German" is not German. Indeed, there are people who are apt not to understand that there is a language called "Saxon". Anyway, we don't want to open this up with endless debates whether it would be better to say "Chinese" is not Chinese or that "Gaelic" is not Gaelic or "slang" is not slang or ... TomS TDotO (talk) 13:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Removed "German" is not German.Edit
- There is no claim that there is an Anglo-German tribe, and no reference to Germans. It is about the word "German", not about the Germans. There is no need to change or remove this example. As I suggested above, to make changes to this example is to open things up to endless, pointless discussion. Let things be, unless there is something wrong or misleading, not just trivial cosmetic changes. TomS TDotO (talk) 12:20, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
I am doubtful if "eggcorn", "mondegreen" etc. are autological. You see, "eggcorn" may be defined as "a malformed term for acorn" in which case the word is an eggcorn, but not autological; in the sense "a term for malformed words based on mishearing", "eggcorn" is no longer an "eggcorn" because no mishearing has taken place. Similar for two conceivable definitions of "mondegreen", "1. Mondegreen, supposed Scottish aristocratic surname; 2. mondegreen: misheard lyrics" (definition 2. is not based on a mishearing), or "bahuvrihi", "1. Sanskrit for 'one who has much rice'; 2. an exocentric compound" (definition 2. is no longer an exocentric compound, compounds do not own rice). The only possible exception might be oxymoron, if read as "being really clever in an apparently stupid way" because this describes the actual class of words or expressions in a way that is, arguably, "pointedly incongruous".
I was looking for the term for "an example of a class being taken as a term for that class" (as in mondegreen). This is probably not "autological", most likely this would just be called synecdoche (Synecdoche#Specific_class_name_referring_to_general_set_of_associated_things)? --dab (𒁳) 13:56, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
The style of text in which a word is printed is not relevant to its being autologicalEdit
An editor classified the word blue, when written in blue typeface, as autological.
The font a word is printed in is irrelevant to its autological status; words exist apart from their typography. (Otherwise the word miniscule, when written thus: miniscule, would be autologically miniscule, etc.; indeed, essentially every word would be sometimes autological, sometimes not. Clean Copytalk 17:53, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
The word metaphor itself is a metaphor, coming from a Greek term meaning to "transfer" or "carry across." Metaphors "carry" meaning from one word, image, idea, or situation to another. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:2C3:4201:D70:EDBE:79BA:F847:1756 (talk) 23:00, 20 December 2020 (UTC)