Talk:Australian Imperial Force

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Military history: South Pacific

This disambiguation page is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force

Australia: Military history

	Australia portal Australian Imperial Force is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
	This disambiguation page is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Strip down to disambig? edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I'm not sure than an article at this title could serve as anything more than a disambiguation page linking to the 1st and 2nd AIFs. Does anyone disagree, or would there be any objection to stripping down this page and refactoring as a disambig? -- saberwyn 02:35, 5 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

That sounds like a good idea. Nick-D (talk) 12:04, 5 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. Anotherclown (talk) 11:28, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Done, although it could probably use tweaking. -- saberwyn 12:08, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic