Talk:Atala Riffo and Daughters v. Chile
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Comments edit
This article should not be deleted. It is notable because of the headlines it made and because it is a high profile human rights case in Chile. Qrc2006 14:38, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- If no other event hinged on this case then this article is simply a piece of campaigning journalism, which has no place in an encyclopedia.Twospoonfuls 14:42, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- Also the disparaging tone in which the husband is refered to is not NPOV.Twospoonfuls 14:45, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- OK. I agree it's a keeper.Twospoonfuls 15:35, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Refactoring edit
The article had some signficant issues, not so much neutrality (although I understand those concerns) as the casting of it as biography. See WP:BLP1E. As a result, I've refactored the article into an article on the case--which is really what the previous article was about. It still needs work, and there's no reason we can't have appropriate redirects for Karen Atala and such, but this is really the proper way to handle this data within Wikipedia. --j⚛e deckertalk 01:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Atala Riffo and Daughters v. Chile. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121214010728/http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/mexican_supreme_court_rules_for_marriage_equality/singleton/ to http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/mexican_supreme_court_rules_for_marriage_equality/singleton/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130228032226/http://www.cidh.org:80/demandas/12.502ENG.pdf to http://www.cidh.org/demandas/12.502ENG.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:34, 20 October 2016 (UTC)