Talk:Astronomical art

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Merge proposal

edit

Space art and Astronomical art would appear to be the same thing; there's no good reason for duplicate articles. RandomCritic 21:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


I would suggest that greater diversity be identified rather than creating a larger grouping. Space Artist, Astronomical Artist and artists working directly with space technology using conceptual, interactive robotics and other new media techniques do not fall within an "Astronomical Art" catagory. Some artists, working with space as a theme or using microgravity as an environmental contributing factor in their processes, do NOT illustrate or paint astronomical or space science achievments but are creating unique arts and space flight collaborations direct with scientists. I would not support seeing both merged as there are many artists who now work with space flight technology, as space artists, who would not consider themselves as creating 'Astronomical Art'

Open for disucssion. Galaxica. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Galaxica (talkcontribs) 17. jan 2008 kl. 05:11

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Astronomical art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:03, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply