Talk:Association of Surgeons in Training

Unreferenced?

I'm slightly confused regarding the assertion that the source is unreferenced - the link is given on the page to the website from which the information is derived. Beyond that, and my personal knowledge (as I am currently the Treasurer of ASiT), I'm not sure what references are sought.

Further advice would be gratefully received.

Jfbcubed 19:32, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Royal Colleges

I have slightly amended the wording and specified which Royal Colleges I am referring to, in response to a "dn" tag. Jfbcubed 22:34, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Advertisment

The article seems to be worded as an advertisement of the ASiT, and needs revision. Traya101 (talk) 13:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

• It might come across that way, but it isn't intended. After all, this is merely a charitable organisation intent on promoting excellence in surgical training in the United Kingdom. There is no ulterior agenda. Jfbcubed (talk) 23:03, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm a little new at this; I volunteered to help the administrator Whatamidoing in reviewing the stubs on medical articles. With regards to the stub classification, I think this should be upgraded to "start". I asked this very question yesterday, and although links are wonderful things, I think their is an attempt to maintain the academic integrity by citing published literature. Perhaps a "reference" should answer the question "How is this article significant in the real world?" Has the Times written an article about the school? Have academic journals written about the school itself? Your contributions are EXTEMELY valuable, but I find learning the process of being a good Wikipedian a little tedious....but ultimately worthwhile. doctorwolfie (talk) 12:44, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Association of Surgeons in Training. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150630155907/http://www.asit.org/events/conferences/Glasgow2015 to http://www.asit.org/events/conferences/Glasgow2015
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150630195857/http://www.asit.org/about/silverscalpel/about to http://www.asit.org/about/silverscalpel/about
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060205110113/http://asit.org:80/ to http://www.asit.org

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:33, 20 October 2016 (UTC)