Talk:Asclepias syriaca

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2601:243:2100:16A5:AC7F:EAB8:4D6E:857D in topic Ecology paragraph repeats

Scientific Classification edit

Should the family be changed to Apocynaceae to be consistent with the Asclepias Genus? Moadeeb 15:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moadeeb (talkcontribs)

"Rockies" vs. "Rocky Mountains" edit

I've changed the link for Rockies to Rocky Mountains, instead of the disambiguation page. I figured that if people were interested in the Common Milkweed and its location(s) of growth, they probably didn't care too much about the Colorado Rockies (baseball or former NHL). If anybody feels differently (that the link /should/ go to the disambiguation page), by all means, change it back, but it just seemed somewhat pointless to me. ~ Caejis (talk) 01:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Milkweed is edible edit

And pretty tasty too. In May and early June (in New Hampshire), before the milkweed shot into flower, we would pick the topmost tender leaves of the plant. These we would boil and dress with vinegar and enjoy. I understand from other sites that milkweed is mildly toxic, but that boiling largely negates the toxicity. Anyway, if you are the adventurous type, give it a try. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.108.21 (talk) 23:32, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Etymology Can we add the etymology of the scientific name "Asclepias syriaca?" Asclepius was a hero and god of medicine in ancient Greek religion and mythology. Thanks. Moadeeb 19:46, 18 June 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moadeeb (talkcontribs)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Asclepias syriaca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Asclepias syriaca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

A. syriaca is not invasive edit

Under "Cultivation," this article currently states that A. syriaca can become invasive. I understand that's a quote from a USDA publication, but the quote goes against the USDA definition of an invasive plant: "A plant that is both non-native and able to establish on many sites, grow quickly, and spread to the point of disrupting plant communities or ecosystems." A. syriaca is native to the majority of North America, and therefore cannot be considered invasive in the USA, unless we specify a different ecological region where it is nonnative. How should we change the article to reflect this? --Gatsbythegerbil (talk) 22:45, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

In the preceding section, it's noted that A. syriaca has appeared in Oregon and the EU. I say let's leave it at that.--Quisqualis (talk) 03:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ecology paragraph repeats edit

Ecology paragraph repeats 2601:243:2100:16A5:AC7F:EAB8:4D6E:857D (talk) 17:48, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply