Talk:Art Bulla

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Notability edit

There doesn't seem to be any evidence that Mr. Bulla has any followers or is anything more than just an individual with a web page. Unless some references can be produced that he has gained a following or has had some impact on Latter Day Saint thought, I propose that we delete this article or merge it with a general article on sects within Mormonism. --MrWhipple (talk) 02:29, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

He seems to have only a handful of followers, judging from his podcasts. I think merging into an article on sects within Mormonism is a good idea. Wilson44691 (talk) 03:05, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Art Bulla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:08, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply