 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
We've already had a discussion about having links to all websites that come down the pike...Wikipedia isn't a web directory. --Larry Sanger
Worth of this article? edit
What exactly is the worth of this article? The ArtCyclopeida is a valuable resource, but I don't think it requires a separate encyclopedia article. Referencing it in relevant art articles should be enough. Tullie 20:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Why I removed PROD edit
I don't see any reason to single this article out for deletion while retaining articles about similar web resources, as listed in Category:Virtual art museums and galleries. At a bare minimum, the proposed deletion should be discussed at AfD. Artcyclopedia seems to be widely respected, as indicated by the following collection of online reviews, articles, and awards:
- http://www.ala.org/ala/rusa/rusaourassoc/rusasections/mars/marspubs/marsbestref2001.htm
- http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0NEW/is_1999_Sept_1/ai_55660092
- http://www.lib.utulsa.edu/databases/descriptions/ARTCYC.asp
- http://www.labforculture.org/en/layout/set/textonly/resources/artcyclopedia
- http://www.usc.edu/e_resources/isd/gateways/948.php
- http://www.thegoodwebguide.co.uk/index.php?rid=124
- http://www.nea.org/webresources/artslitlinks.html
--orlady 16:30, 27 June 2007 (UTC)