Infobox

edit

I'm not sure whether an infobox is needed here (although it is present there, for example). However if it was deleted the information it contained has to be incorporated in the article. Alæxis¿question? 20:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Planning to do some extensive work on this article and will be adding this info there for sure. Steelmate (talk) 23:39, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Anti-Armenianism in Georgia

edit

So what exactly is being disputed here? Steelmate (talk) 07:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

All problems that are described in the section cannot be united under the term Anti-Armenianism. It's POV and OR. The overall tone of the article is significantly biased, trying to illustrate the group as victims rather than giving a neutral and comprehensive ethnographic overview of this important component of Georgia's ethnic and social structure.--KoberTalk 07:35, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
All problems discribed are of the anti-armenian nature so as long as they do describe anti armenian actions those actions do belong to this section. The title "Anti-Armenianism in Georgia" is not considered to be POV title and existed before in other wikipedia article Anti-Armenianism. And the last, this section is not finished and in my opinion deserves it's own page once the content will be expanded. Steelmate (talk) 14:18, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Nope. Even if we assume that the term “Anti-Armenianism” exists in any credible publication other than Wikipedia, it is supposed to mean a systematic discriminatory campaign or universal hatred against the Armenian people. You will have to prove that such a phenomenon exists in Georgia.--KoberTalk 15:13, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
It does exist, and every Armenian has felt it. The universal hatred or hatred of majority or hatred of some of the population is still a hatred and falls under the umbrella of “Anti-Armenianism”. It shoudln't be universal as even Antisemitism was not universal in Fascist Germany. Steelmate (talk) 19:37, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Are you a spokesman for “every Armenian”? Ethnic problems are a sensitive area and should be described in a neutral manner using credible sources and not generalized in order to promote some neologisms. Following your logic, I should now assume that daily attacks against Georgia and Georgians in some nationalistic Armenian media outlets or taxi drivers-generated urban legends of Shota Rustaveli’s Armenianness is a manifestation of… well, not quite universal, but still Anti-Georgianism in Armenia. Would I be correct?--KoberTalk 20:13, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I would recommend you (and everybody interested) to go to georgian forums and read responses of regular georgian users on topics regarding Armenians in general and Armenians in Georgia in particular. It is open hatred and dislike! Not all posts, but vast majority. Now I have yet to see this kind of hatred from Armenians towards Georgians. The Armenian response to this hatred is surprise and it might (and is) growing into reciprocal hatred (Anti-Georgianism) as well. Shota Rustaveli being Armenian or Georgian - has nothing to do with sentiment towards georgian people, it is a historical question. But denying jobs, denying legal rights, and publicly stated hatred is indicator of the sentiment in the modern (or is it modern?) georgian society. Steelmate (talk) 09:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Web-forums are not considered to be sources in Wikipedia. One thing I can tell you is that Georgian forums strongly prohibit anti-national posts and users who dare to write them are banned. This is not case in many popular Armenian websites such as the notoriously nationalistic hayastan.com. As for the Rustaveli case and similar “historical questions”, claiming cultural achievements by your neighbors as yours does contribute to the inter-communal tensions. I’m not going to waste my time in dealing with your rhetoric anymore. Please provide a neutral, third-party source stating that Armenians are deprived of the rights to work and vote. And please be so kind to give a few examples of “publicly stated hatred” towards Armenians.--KoberTalk 10:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Administartion of georgian forums (f.e. famous forum.ge) may state that it prohibits anti-national posts, but I don't see this being enforced as you say, secondly, those posts still represent sentiments of many georgians which forum fules cannot change. And the last, Armenians are underrepresented in every political and legal and social sphere on Georgia. And that has been stated in the article with necessery references. Steelmate (talk) 11:57, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Examples? References? Mqinvartsveri (talk) 13:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

It is now four years later, and there is still only a very lean section. It is, furthermore, so far down in the article, that it may not even be detected by the casual reader. Instead, I will dissolve the subsection now but move the contents up to Armenians-Georgia relations. Best regards, --Trinitrix (talk) 15:03, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Image nominated for deletion

edit

No notice was placed here that this image has been nominated for deletion. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 23:13, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Other images used on this page may also have been nominated -- please check them all by clicking on them to see if there is a deletion notification on the image page. If there is, use the link that takes you to "this image's entry" to comment on the nomination for deletion. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 01:13, 29 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

A film by Go Group/Eyewitness Studio is an amateur propaganda

edit

This film is so much one-sided (pro-Georgian), no place for propaganda in Wiki! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.158.145.53 (talk) 05:03, 8 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have just seen the video. There is no explanation how the respondents were selected, who actually did the interviews, when and in which frame the questions were asked, etc. The interviews were done in Russian; any primer in social science studies would have recommended to do them in the native language of those being interviewed. Independent from the contents of the questions being asked, this is not a quality source. I take it out of the article. --Trinitrix (talk) 15:42, 27 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Armenians in Georgia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Armenians in Georgia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Armenians in Georgia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply