Talk:Area codes 519, 226, 548, and 382

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Dialing areas edit

There are on-line resources that list the prefixes by community. Why does this eye-numbing detail need to be on Wikipedia? GBC 19:51, 20 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sentiment echoed. Surely Wikipedia is a knowledge resource, not a repository for this archival detritus. How in heaven does anything below the first few lines--and even that would be a marginal contribution--contribute to a better understanding of Canada? 174.7.25.37 (talk) 17:55, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

1992? edit

I believe the history section is in error. No relief plans were in consideration until the end of the 1990s, so it could not have been approved in 1992. Also, in 1992, the most prevalent form of relief was the split, not the overlay. Alberta had one of Canada's last splits in 1999. GBC (talk) 06:14, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Requested move to "Area codes 226, 519, and 548" edit

Shouldn't the area codes be listed in ascending order? They are in several other overlay area code articles. 134.153.39.171 (talk) 13:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Area codes 519, 226, and 548. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:56, 17 October 2016 (UTC)Reply