Talk:Area codes 270 and 364

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Overlay? edit

Is there any chance they may change it to a 270/364 overlay? It is the only split currently proposed (whether postponed or expected to go ahead) after all. CrazyC83 (talk) 16:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Merge Area code 364 into this page edit

I vote in favor of the merger. Engelhardt (talk) 21:40, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Actually, under the rubric "merge boldly" (See Help:Merging), since this was first proposed a year ago on the merged page with a hatnote and there were zero comments, I went on and performed the merge.Engelhardt (talk) 01:08, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Area codes 270 and 364. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 17 October 2016 (UTC)Reply