Talk:AqBurkitt

Citation in reference with AqBurkitt

It is very surprising for me to read some citation of Gallagher, Hurtado or Howard under the tetragrammaton section which are not concerning directly and even indirectly the AqBurkitt rendering of the tetragrammaton.--Amargor (talk) 14:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Each scholar can be discussed at a time.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 14:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

You don't have understand my point, you have inserted general information that scholars provided that are not specific to this manuscript. You will not make the history of the tetragrammaton in the biblical manuscrits in each manuscrit's article containing the tetragrammaton ? Have you understand my point ?Amargor (talk) 15:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

I get the message, but you're overreaching. If you make a concise question, it is easier to reach an agreement.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 15:18, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Christian or jewish mss ?

I think that the whole controversy could be sum-up by a sentence saying that the origin of the mss is discuted. The different citations of scholar,s too unclassified to be clear, must be avoided ?Amargor (talk) 17:17, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

The discussion is complex, because it includes the place of provenance, the date and the use of YHWH and nomina sacra. It does not seem encyclopedic to limit oneself to give information without going deeper, thus approaching a stub.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 18:41, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

A list of quotes has not made a good encyclopedic article. There is no reasoning between your several quotes of scholars. I have reagence the segment, and suppress the Hurtado quote, he has changed his mind to have the same opinion as Gallagher. See here --Amargor (talk) 20:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. How about AqTaylor?

For improving this (@Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco, Amargor, and Wiklol:. Could the editors involved in rescuing it also consider improving AqTaylor, which in the current form also doesn't indicate the significance/notability of the topic presented there? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

• @Piotrus:, I have a videoconference to prepare for tomorrow, so there's nothing I can do today. --Wiklol (talk) 12:42, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

  Wiklol, Take your time, we are in no hurry. I am just asking if interested editors could try to improve this other sister article over the coming days or weeks, so it doesn't end up at AfD. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Piotrus, thank you for your consideration.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 23:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)