Talk:Anthropotechnic

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 July 2012. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Science Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of science

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Attempts to wikify edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

While attempting to wikify I have expanded the lead a little and added references. This term is one of those terms that's not recognized by any reputable dictionary and is yet quite fairly used. I have not found any bare HTML's so nothing to do there --Wikishagnik (talk) 21:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

WP:OR? edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This smells like original research to me. It looks like a number of authors use the term differently and this article is trying to synthesize a definition from the various uses. Pburka (talk) 02:18, 8 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic