This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Well, it seems strange, at least to me. What is "legally accurate" supposed to mean, as the first paragraph goes ? -- Jon Ascton (talk) 05:53, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
I would suppose it means that when legal issues arose in her fictional cases, as they not infrequently do in mystery and detective stories, the legal theories or workings of the law were accurately presented. DES(talk) 04:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
What, if anything, does the paragraph featuring Higgins contribute to the article? Other than featuring Higgins, that is? 24.170.162.235 (talk) 20:34, 1 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Can this be fixed?
I revived two subheadings by mistake today, down in edit history. these need to be replaced. SORRY!!! 2601:180:300:37C6:AD91:A3CA:126B:6F5D (talk) 21:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}