Talk:Ann Donnelly

Learn more about this page

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

United States courts and judges Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stay of EO

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

This is a note-worthy ruling by the judge, regardless of one's opinion of its correctness. - Eponymous-Archon (talk) 02:32, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Agreed; I have to assume that Special:Diff/762480469 by ItsPugle (talk · contribs) was a mistake, caused by the rapid number of edits being made. Mackensen (talk) 02:53, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

As Mackensen (talk · contribs) said, this was a mistake on my end. Thank you for catching, and fixing it. :) Have a good day, ItsPugle (Talk) 03:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Glad to hear it! No worries. - Eponymous-Archon (talk) 03:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 29 January 2017

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

remove the scurrilous clause in the first sentence claiming she is a HAMAS and Iranian agent 2601:5C7:8300:87D9:D0C0:DEE4:9925:FE06 (talk) 03:10, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

It was reverted about 50 minutes ago; are you still seeing it? Mackensen (talk) 03:17, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Ann Donnelly.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic