Talk:Ankylorhiza
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic Did you know nomination
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Ankylorhiza appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 August 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:54, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
( )
Life reconstruction of Ankylorhiza tiedemani
- ... that the forward-facing incisors of the extinct dolphin Ankylorhiza (restoration pictured) may have been used to ram feed on prey, similar to a hunting method used by modern orcas? Source: "The enigmatic procumbent incisor tusks may be related to intraspecific combat or prey ramming behavior" "Fossils of Ankylorhiza have not yet revealed evidence of sexual dimorphism, and perhaps procumbent incisor tusks were used during prey ‘‘ramming’’ (e.g., 29) rather than combat as in ziphiids." Boessenecker et al., (2020)
- Comment: Note that I'm posting this nomination quite late at night where I am, so will be doing the QPQ tomorrow morning, cheers! ▼PσlєοGєєкƧɊƲΔƦΣƉ▼ 01:40, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Created by PaleoGeekSquared (talk). Self-nominated at 01:40, 31 July 2020 (UTC).
- Starting review--Kevmin § 04:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Article new enough, and long enough. wording is neutral and matches the sourcing, with all paragraphs cited. Hook is neutral, cited and matches source, and image is main page compliant. No policy issues are found in the article. Waiting for QPQ PaleoGeekSquared.--Kevmin § 14:53, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- QPQ done at Rhus boothilensis, Kevmin. ▼PσlєοGєєкƧɊƲΔƦΣƉ▼ 12:47, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
QPQ done, article is now good to go.--Kevmin § 22:50, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
