Talk:Anita Blake mythology

Latest comment: 11 years ago by 124.149.77.146 in topic "Anitaverse"?

Deletion

edit

150, could you explain your deletion? As it stands, I'm inclined to revert, but I'd like to address your concern if I can. Thanks, TheronJ 14:21, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Too long

edit

Uggh. The mythology page is too long and getting longer, and the table of contents now runs six levels deep. We should probably break it up, but there are a truckload of inbound links all over the novel and character pages. I'll think about whether there's an automated way to fix the links. TheronJ 14:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

- Looking at it, I would say that ideally it could do with being split into about four separate articles: vampires, shapeshifters, other supernatural creatures and humans. That would seem to be the most logical division and would probably make it more user friendly too in some ways, because it is a long article to read. Silverthorn 16:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Maybe I'll give it a shot this weekend, particularly if autowikibrowser can fix the links. TheronJ 17:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
The Vampires information has been moved to a separate article Silverthorn 10:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
The Shapeshifters information has also been moved. Silverthorn 10:42, 29 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
The Humans information has also been moved as it too seemed long enough to justify its own article Silverthorn 09:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Quetzalcoatl

edit

We learn quite a bit about Quetzalcoatls and a little of dragons in general on page 544 of Obsidian Butterfly. I'm going to write up a paragraph or so and stick it uder 'Dragons,' unless anyone has any objections. Anakalypsis 03:01, 30 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Necromancers

edit

One area of mythology that is missing is that of Necromancers. Necromancers, particularly Anita Blake as a Necromancer, play a significant role in the overall series story arc and in the Mother of All Darkness story arc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daveras (talkcontribs) 15:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

"Anitaverse"?

edit

So this is a word now, is it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.149.77.146 (talk) 13:09, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply