Talk:Amphisbaena caeca

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amphisbaena caeca article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Amphisbaena caeca is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Puerto Rico Low‑importance

	Puerto Rico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WRONG PHOTO edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi,

I've seen many times the photo of this article, and everytime I feel that it should be removed!!! The animal in the photo is probably an Scolecophidian (thread snakes), which are totally different to amphisbaenians. An amphisbaenian should look like this: http://www.kingsnake.com/westindian/amphisbaenacaeca3.JPG.

Hope this helps to improve this article.

Best regards! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.145.16.4 (talk) 16:49, 18 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic