Talk:Amosan

Comments

Agreed, and futhermore the 1979 study that was cited from the Journal of Clinical Peridontology isnt exactly "recent". Trweb2 (talk) 20:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Does this strike anyone else as overtly commercial? At a minimum, we should get some context on the "double-blind" study and a source for the "hard to locate" claim, as well as the overt plug for Walgreens. --67.160.74.124 18:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Although poorly cited and limited, I wouldn't say it is commercial when the product is no longer available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.112.147.41 (talk) 23:58, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Maybe slightly commercialized again by my last addition - but listing the only known source of a product with very limited availability doesn't feel abusive to my sense of appropriateness. Slaurel (talk) 02:47, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Bocasan with Amosan

Same thing, medically. Artoria2e5 🌉 15:43, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Different formulations and different manufacturers though. I wouldn't recommend merging the two together, given these difference, but perhaps a merge to the shared active ingredient, sodium perborate, might be appropriate. It could fit in the Uses section, perhaps as a new section on Dental use. Klbrain (talk) 10:37, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Closing this discussion, having placed templates for this alternative proposal; let's discuss over on Talk:Sodium perborate. Klbrain (talk) 14:07, 9 September 2023 (UTC)