Talk:American Battlefield Trust

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Civil War Trust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071105061756/http://www.civilwarnews.com/archive/articles/spennfitts.htm to http://www.civilwarnews.com/archive/articles/spennfitts.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081013155205/http://www.civilwarnews.com/archive/articles/chancellorsville_143_acres.htm to http://www.civilwarnews.com/archive/articles/chancellorsville_143_acres.htm
• Added archive https://archive.is/20120707134933/http://archives.postandcourier.com/archive/arch06/0106/arc01132802083.shtml to http://archives.postandcourier.com/archive/arch06/0106/arc01132802083.shtml
• Added archive https://archive.is/20120707040740/http://archives.postandcourier.com/archive/arch06/0206/arc02032850478.shtml to http://archives.postandcourier.com/archive/arch06/0206/arc02032850478.shtml
• Added archive https://archive.is/20130210055700/http://yellowbordermagazine.com/ngm/0504/feature5/index.html to http://yellowbordermagazine.com/ngm/0504/feature5/index.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://thisweekinthecivilwar.com/2011/07/24/manassas-rescue-fueled-preservation-movement/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:01, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

no "slavery"?

it is worth noting that, @ this precise moment, the words "slave", "slavery", "slav-" -anything DO NOT APPEAR ANYWHERE in this article, at all.

kind if a big thing to omit, in an article about a civil war "historical" soiciety, no?

:p

(& no section about "controversies"?)

Lx 121 (talk) 06:30, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Flagging article as non-NPOV

The presence of section titles such as "Battlefield preservation achievements" and "The Civil War Trust's grassroots activities", copious puffery and peacocking throughout the article text, and numerous links to the organization's own website used as citations (the textbook definition of "overreliance on primary sources") leads me to question this article's conformity to WP:NPOV. Heavy recent editing by new Wikipedian User:SaveOurHistory does nothing to allay those concerns, though this article already had issues with tone even before those edits. I'm flagging the article as problematic for all of the reasons discussed, and will place a WP:COI reminder template on SaveOurHistory's talk page on the off chance they are connected with the subject of this article. -- FeRD_NYC (talk) 02:54, 29 November 2017 (UTC)