Talk:Alice (1988 film)

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Smetanahue in topic still needs work!

Fair use rationale for Image:Neco Z Alenky.jpg

edit
 

Image:Neco Z Alenky.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Who fucking cares? This fair use crap and tiny piss weak pictures really pisses me and every other normal person off.

  1. Numbered list item

still needs work!

edit

I've reworked this article significantly, dividing it into "plot" and "style and technique" sections, and rewritten sections to eliminate the personal reflection feel. I hope someone more knowledgable about film, this film, and wikipedia standards regarding articles about films will continue to work on this. "The film's visuals have been described" statement needs a citation (or multiple). I am disinclined to simply remove it, but I don't know how best deal with it. The article could also use a more complete "Reception" section, considering it's place in cinematic history, but that is also beyond me.140.163.0.5 (talk) 15:47, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Good work! I added a bit of production info, but I think it will be difficult to get very far without proper offline research, or at least without knowing Czech. Smetanahue (talk) 18:21, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply