Talk:Alfred Hartemink

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 331dot in topic Evident self-promotion - should be deleted

Self-promotion

edit

This seems to be a shameless effort of self-promotion. Is Alfred Hartemink really notable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.210.240.137 (talk) 03:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Published works

edit

Notable published works should be listed in the article. "He has over 150 publications including 5 books and many papers in international refereed journals" -- Paleorthid (talk) 15:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Closed AfD

edit

The consensus for the AfD was that the article needs a re-write. — ERcheck (talk) 16:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Alfred Hartemink/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

* Notable published works should be listed. -- Paleorthid (talk) 15:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 15:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 07:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Evident self-promotion - should be deleted

edit

This page is an evident attempt of self-promotion. There is nothing notable with this scientist, no more than with hundred others. There is also high suspicion that Alfred Hartemink himself created this page. Wikipedia should not serve self-promotion.

Pedro201649 (talk) 08:10, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

You are free to open an Articles for Deletion discussion to formally propose that this article be deleted. 331dot (talk) 09:06, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply