Talk:Alexander Larman
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
How to use sources to demonstrate "depth" edit
It is no good in edit-warring style adding and re-adding citations from good newspapers in the hope that these will magically sprinkle notability wiffle-dust on an article.
The finest newspapers and textbooks can mention an author or other subject briefly, trivially, or in passing, conferring no trace of notability whatsoever.
The correct solution is not to keep shoving in more and more trivial mentions supported by more and more unproven citations, but to use the sources to prove notability by paraphrasing what they say about Larman, and if necessary quoting briefly from them, to demonstrate that they indeed cover him in depth (if they do). If not, the citations are in fact obfuscation designed to give the appearance of notability where none exists. I do hope this principle is clear. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)