 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Following a Canadian Broadcasting Corporation investigation, finding mercury contamination commonly in excess of the 0.5 ppm maximum exposure, Health Canada has issued new guidelines: reference http://www.cbc.ca/canada/manitoba/story/2007/02/19/tuna-testing.html
Image copyright problem with Image:MSC ecolabel.png edit
The image Image:MSC ecolabel.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
What is "white meat tuna" and why is it so significant edit
This and other tuna articles make a point that, in the US, only Albacore can be marketed as "white meat tuna". What exactly is "white meat tuna"? Is it just a US term for Albacore? Does it have a wider meaning outside the US than in it? Is there a particular reason why the term needs legal regulation? The articles as they are prompt more questions than answers, and need to be expanded for the benefit of those unfamiliar with American tuna politics. Wardog (talk) 09:51, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Why is it so prized? edit
A paragraph on why albacore/"white" tuna is so prized would be useful.--Froglich (talk) 19:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
daily ration edit
I have removed a misleading statement "Due to so much energy being used by the constant movement, a typical tuna may eat one-quarter its own weight in food in one day" which was based on the following reference "All About A Tuna’s Life." Tuna Facts & Life Cycle. Bumble Bee Foods, LLC. Web. 25 Oct 2013. <http://www.bumblebee.com/about/seafood-school/life/> This suggests a 25% BW daily ration, which is clearly incorrect, given the daily ration of tunas studied to date varies inversely with body size from around 5% BW/day in small fish down to 1% BW/day, ( http://icesjms.oxfordjournals.org/content/66/4/720.full) [1],. If this is considered important information, I suggest a more realistic daily ration estimate of 1.0-1.1% BW/day should be indicated for adult albacore as used by Watanabe et al. (2004) [2] Professor Pelagic (talk) 08:01, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not that anyone asked, but I support this. Non-biologists are too prone to swallow unsupported assertions about large animals eating large fractions of their own mass daily. It might be true for some small shrew spp. or the like, but not large fish. JonRichfield (talk) 07:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
References
- ^ Griffiths et al (2009) Temporal and size-related variation in the diet, consumption rate, and daily ration of mackerel tuna (Euthynnus affinis) in neritic waters of eastern Australia. ICES J. Mar. Sci. (2009) 66 (4): 720-733.
- ^ Watanabe H., Kubodera T., Masuda S., Kawahara S. Feeding habits of albacore Thunnus alalunga in the transition region of the central North Pacific. Fisheries Science 2004;70:573-579.
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Albacore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402102309/https://www.iccat.int/Documents/SCRS/ExecSum/ALB_EN.pdf to https://www.iccat.int/Documents/SCRS/ExecSum/ALB_EN.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402091335/http://www.iotc.org/sites/default/files/documents/science/species_summaries/english/Albacore.pdf to http://www.iotc.org/sites/default/files/documents/science/species_summaries/english/Albacore.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402150439/http://isc.ac.affrc.go.jp/pdf/ISC14pdf/Annex%2011-%20NPALB%20Stock%20Assessment%20Report_revsied%2029Aug14.pdf to http://isc.ac.affrc.go.jp/pdf/ISC14pdf/Annex%2011-%20NPALB%20Stock%20Assessment%20Report_revsied%2029Aug14.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070912080740/http://www.seachoice.org/profile/70/view to http://www.seachoice.org/profile/70/view
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718034839/http://wfoa-tuna.com/ to http://wfoa-tuna.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060114062957/http://seafood.ucdavis.edu/pubs/albacorefishery.htm to http://seafood.ucdavis.edu/pubs/albacorefishery.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:42, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
To add to article edit
Basic information to add to this article: the etymology of the word "albacore." 173.88.246.138 (talk) 21:32, 16 May 2021 (UTC)