Talk:Alan F. Westin

Latest comment: 2 years ago by JimHarperDC in topic Non-neutral critical material

About awards

edit

Let's add this to the Awards section: the Louis D. Brandeis Privacy Award:

http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/06/top-experts-discuss-privacy-risks-at-2nd-international-summit-on-the-future-of-health-privacy/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndrewOram (talkcontribs) 17:59, 11 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wrong quotation?

edit

I cannot find the quote "to control, edit, manage, and delete information about them[selves] and decide when, how, and to what extent information is communicated to others." in my printed version of Alan Westins "Privacy and Freedom" (1967 Atheneum New York) there is a similar but different one on page 7 ("Privacy is the claim of individuals, groups, or institutions to determine for themselves when, how, and to what extent information about them is communicated to others."). Anyone can confirm the quote in the article with a page number? — Preceding unsigned comment added by XSfDFaI (talkcontribs) 14:43, 9 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

I agree that the quote that appeared in the article up to now is a misquote. I've quoted his page 7 definition many times and in many works, and have now fixed it here. JimHarperDC (talk) 16:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alan Westin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alan Westin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Non-neutral critical material

edit

I wonder if the penultimate paragraph in the "Work" section is gratuitously critical of Westin's work. The critics cited have viewpoints that differ with his on the merits. They are not analysts of bias and its presence or absence.

I shouldn't be the judge of it because I tend to agree with Westin. But if someone who is not involved in privacy debates judges the critical material imbalanced, I'd encourage making it more even.

(This assumes that a person exists who is not involved in the privacy debate somehow or opinionated on the topic.)

JimHarperDC (talk) 20:01, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply