Talk:Al Odah v. United States

Who writes legislation?

There's a statement in the first paragraph that, "the Bush administration has passed legislation ...". I thought Congress did such things. Perhaps this needs re-wording? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lindes (talk • contribs) 06:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

rough work

1. redirect Rasul v. Bush

• Civil Action No. 02-cv-299
• Civil Action 02-cv-299
• Case No. 02-cv-299
• No. 02-cv-299
• 02-cv-299
• Civil Action No. 02-CV-299
• Civil Action 02-CV-299
• Case No. 02-CV-299
• No. 02-CV-299
• 02-CV-299
• Civil Action No. 02-cv-0299
• Civil Action 02-cv-0299
• Case No. 02-cv-0299
• No. 02-cv-0299
• 02-cv-0299
• Civil Action No. 02-CV-0299
• Civil Action 02-CV-0299
• Case No. 02-CV-0299
• No. 02-CV-0299
• 02-CV-0299
• Civil Action No. 02-299
• Civil Action 02-299
• Case No. 02-299
• No. 02-299
• 02-299
• Civil Action No. 02-0299
• Civil Action 02-0299
• Case No. 02-0299
• No. 02-0299
• 02-0299

Confusing/should be merged with Boumedieneg

As this petition was consolidated with Boumediene v. Bush, I don't think there should be a separate article under this title. Boumediene is used to refer to the 2008 decision, not Al Odah v. US, and to the issues covered in the decision, which applies to all the plaintiffs. Parkwells (talk) 01:09, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

I consulted with the Wikiproject on Supreme Court cases regarding this article, as I think it should be merged with Boumediene v. Bush, with which it was consolidated. Here are responses, copied from the TAlk page at the projectParkwells (talk) 17:56, 25 January 2013 (UTC):

• My opinion is that if it was consolidated with Boumediene, only that case should show the SCOTUS information, with Al Odah incorporated into the history. If we keep the Al Odah article, it needs to be reduced to the Circuit Court opinion and then linked to the SCOTUS case. I would tend to turn the Al Odah article into a redirect. Of course, this is JMO. GregJackP Boomer! 02:07, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

• I agree with Greg above. I believe that's our current practice with these pages, like the healthcare case where there's one page for the single SCOTUS decision, though it was two or three consolidated cases. -- Lord Roem ~ (talk) 03:56, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Federal court structure

There was confusion in terms in this article. The habeas corpus petitions were filed with the federal "United States District Court for the District of Columbia". This cannot be referred to as "the D.C. court", as in one example since corrected. The District of Columbia government does have its own court system. But the federal court in the area is the US District Court for [the region] District of Columbia. Cases on appeal go to the "US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia," and, if appealed again and accepted for hearing, to the "US Supreme Court."Parkwells (talk) 01:09, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Al Odah v. United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071026220249/http://www.pegc.us/archive/Al_Odah_vs_US/memo_opinion_20040727.pdf to http://www.pegc.us/archive/Al_Odah_vs_US/memo_opinion_20040727.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Al Odah v. United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Replaced archive link http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.boston.com%2Fnews%2Fnation%2Fwashington%2Farticles%2F2007%2F06%2F23%2Fofficer_criticizes_military_tribunals%2F&date=2008-10-24 with http://www.webcitation.org/5bohX35JL?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.boston.com%2Fnews%2Fnation%2Fwashington%2Farticles%2F2007%2F06%2F23%2Fofficer_criticizes_military_tribunals%2F on http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2007/06/23/officer_criticizes_military_tribunals/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pegc.us/archive/OK_v_Bush/govt_resp_to_GK_20060815.pdf
• Replaced archive link http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnatseclaw.typepad.com%2Fnatseclaw%2Ffiles%2FHamdan.28j.letter.pdf&date=2008-09-30 with https://web.archive.org/web/20081002190428/http://natseclaw.typepad.com/natseclaw/files/Hamdan.28j.letter.pdf on http://natseclaw.typepad.com/natseclaw/files/Hamdan.28j.letter.pdf
• Replaced archive link http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdocs.justia.com%2Fcases%2Ffederal%2Fdistrict-courts%2Fdistrict-of-columbia%2Fdcdce%2F1%3A2008mc00442%2F131990%2F88%2F0.pdf&date=2008-08-22 with http://www.webcitation.org/5aHZBfVUl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdocs.justia.com%2Fcases%2Ffederal%2Fdistrict-courts%2Fdistrict-of-columbia%2Fdcdce%2F1%3A2008mc00442%2F131990%2F88%2F0.pdf on http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2008mc00442/131990/88/0.pdf
• Replaced archive link http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pegc.us%2Farchive%2FAl_Odah_vs_US%2Fmemo_opinion_20040727.pdf&date=2008-11-19 with https://web.archive.org/web/20071026220249/http://www.pegc.us/archive/Al_Odah_vs_US/memo_opinion_20040727.pdf on http://www.pegc.us/archive/Al_Odah_vs_US/memo_opinion_20040727.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:13, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Al Odah v. United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080208154544/http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2007/06/guantanamo-tribunal-officer-says-csrts.php to http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2007/06/guantanamo-tribunal-officer-says-csrts.php
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2007/06/23/officer_criticizes_military_tribunals/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071122132746/http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=40161 to http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=40161
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071209194052/http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0745%2Chentoff%2C78285%2C2.html to http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0745%2Chentoff%2C78285%2C2.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1%3A2008mc00442/131990/88/0.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:45, 29 June 2017 (UTC)