Requested move 30 September 2015

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed after several week, apologies for making you jump through the extra hoops. Jenks24 (talk) 08:31, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply


Al-Jazira provinceAl-Jazira Province – Class names contained in names of geographic entities are normally (rare exceptions exist) capitalized in the English Wikipedia. The article is about an entity covering territory that is currently part of Syria. For such entities capitalization is the standard way, compare: Jazira Canton, Latakia Governorate, Daraa District – 91.9.99.97 (talk) 13:01, 30 September 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 07:24, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Seems like it might be a form of natural disambiguation rather than a proper name? Not sure, will let someone else make the call. Jenks24 (talk) 13:10, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Jenks24, your statement mixes the difference between short names and long names with the difference in capitalization. It is not the short name, i.e. "Al-Jazira", which would omit the class name, but irrespective of inclusion of the class name, it is one of the proper names for that entity. Same goes for Jazira Canton, Latakia Governorate, Daraa District and any US county: short name "Blaine", full name "County of Blaine" OR "Blaine County" OR "Blaine county" - all are proper names; WP article Blaine County, Nebraska NOT Blaine county, Nebraska. 91.9.99.97 (talk) 15:51, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Notice in all the examples you've given that the "long name" is capitalised and bolded in the lead. Not the case for Al-Jazira province. Jenks24 (talk) 15:55, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Jenks24, your statement mixes two bugs. Easy to find articles that have that bug in the lead, but not the other bug in the article title: Buenos Aires Province, Entre Ríos Province. 91.9.99.97 (talk) 16:18, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:41, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

As the creator of this article, I confess I made a spelling mistake when I didn't put a capital letter to "province" in the title, maybe because I'm still mainly a native French speaker and I sometimes forget where to put capital letters in English, sorry :-/ --Minorities observer (talk) 15:50, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

User:Minorities observer, it is not a mistake in English. There are other conventions that write "Washington county" instead of "Washington County". Only in the English Wikipedia, the overwhelming choice is to capitalize the class name if it is part of a geographic name. 91.9.120.145 (talk) 23:32, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Al-Jazira Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:55, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Recent modifications

edit

I don't understand the relevance of statistics coming from an obviously biased and activist source, "the National Association of Arab Youth". In addition, why are there now two identical tables with 1943 and 1953 censuses results ? The new one is not accurate as it doesn't list Chaldeans and "Nestorians" among the Assyrians, a national denomination which included Syrian Orthodox and Catholics in the older table. On the other hand, French colonial statistics had a narrower definition of "Assyrians", i.e. "Nestorians". --Minorities observer (talk) 13:56, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

I understand your point about the French mandate authorities and how they separated Christians from Assyrians, may be based on eastern vs western churches. Anyway, these are the data we have at hand and we cannot really change the description, unless we merge Assyrian and Christian under one Assyrian/Christian. As for the other point, this is a source like any other source, and we have no information to accuse it of being biased. Actually, similar articles (e.g., rojava, Afron canton, etc.) are mainly based on militant-affiliated sources (Hawar, Basnews, ARAnews, etc), and even some blogs. Cheers, Amr ibn Kulthoumعمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 02:40, 18 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:08, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply