Talk:Aegyptosaurus

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Aegyptosaurus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 November 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the only surviving fossils of Aegyptosaurus were destroyed in a 1944 bombing raid on Munich, Germany during World War II?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2005/November.

Wikipedia

Spinosaurus Hunting Aegyptosaurus

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is it really possible that Spinosaurus could have hunted such a large creature? I thought it basically ate fish and didn't have the right kind of jaws for bringing down large dinosaurs. Benosaurus 21:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

April Fools

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Many of the changes made on April 3 appear to be repeating an April fool's joke and should be reverted eventually if not immediately. See [1] for the hoax source and the second through fourth pages of [2] for confirmation that it's a joke. 128.148.37.12 (talk) 03:40, 8 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Done. In my defense, it appears the offending entry was posted after 12:00pm, so who's the fool, huh? ;) Dinoguy2 (talk) 05:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic